GIVE AND TAKE BY ADAM GRANT

(A
revolutionary approach to success at work and life).
Author: Adam Grant
Who is Adam Grant?
I
cannot possibly do a comprehensive review of this book without giving an
insight into the life and background of the author.
Adam
Grant an award wining researcher and Wharton’s
height-rated professor. He holds a Phd in Organization Psychology from the
University of Michigan and a BA from Harvard University. He is a former
record-setting advertising director for junior Olympic Springboard and also professional
magician. He is an award wining researcher
and teacher.
Adam
Grant consults and speaks for Google,
NFL IBM, Gloxosmithkline, Goldman Sachs, The World Economic Forum, the
United Nations, and the US Army and Navy.
He
has been honoured as one of the business week’s favourite Professor. He is also
one of the world’s top forty business
professors under the age of forty.
Adam
Grant, an award winning researcher and Wharton’s heights-rated professor,
explains the surprising forces that shaped why some people rise to the top of
ladder of success, while others sink to the bottom.
In
day to day dealings with people, it was found out that most people operate
either as Givers, Takers or Matchers.
The illustrations from this books also reviewed how Takers strive to get as much as possible from others, Matchers aim to trade evenly, while Givers are the rare breed of people who
contribute to others without expecting anything in return.
Although
some Givers get exploited and give up, others achieve extra ordinary result
with a wonderful network that will encourage others to guarantee giving.
Let us now x-ray the wonderful things this book will do for us.
GIVE AND TAKE: THINGS TO LEARN FROM THE BOOK
2.
Why people underestimate the act of giving.
3. How Givers, takers and matchers development networks and how their Interactions within the networks have different characters and consequences.
4. How Givers succeed by recognizing the potential in others.
5. How to influence others through the act of giving.
6. Why some givers burn out, while others don’t; how givers avoid being explored by takers and what individuals, groups and organizations can do to protect givers and spread their success.
There is this understanding that the highly successful people have three things in common, motivation, ability and opportunity. If we want to succeed, we need a combination of hard work talent and lucks. Success depends heavily on how we approach out interactions with other people. When we interact with other people at work, there are various choices available for us to make, do we try to claim as much value as we earn or contribute value without worming about what we receiving nature.
Takers
have distinctive signature; they like to get more than they give. They lift
reciprocity in their own favour, putting their own interest ahead of others.
Takers believe that the world is a competitive, dog-eat-dog place. They usually feel that to succeed, they need to
do better than others. To prove their competence, they self-promote and make sure
they get plenty of credit for their efforts. Takers usually think “if I don’t look out for myself first, no
one will”.
Givers
are the opposite of takers. They prefer to give more than they get. Whereas
takers tend to be self-focused, evaluating what other people can offer them,
givers pays more attention to what other people need from them. Giver and
takers are not distinguished by how much they donate to charity (which means
the preferences are not about money). Later, givers and takers differ in their
attitude and actions toward other people. If your as taker, you help others
strategically. When the benefits to you out weight the personal costs. If you
are a giver, you help whenever the benefits to others exceed the personal cost
helping without expecting anything in return.
These
are people striving to preserve an equal balance of giving and taking. They
operate the principle of fairness. When
they help others, they protect themselves by seeking returns. Matchers believe in tit for tat, and their relationships
are governed by even exchanges of favours.
Giving,
Taking and Matching are three fundamental of social interaction, but the lines
between them are not hard and fast. “What
are you?
Ultimately,
givers and takers may have equal large relationships, givers are able to
produce far more lasting value through their networks, and in ways that might
not seen obvious. The more altruistic your attitude, the more benefits you will
gain from the relationship. “If you set
out to help others, you will rapidly reinforce your own reputation and expand
your universe of possibilities”.
When we see a taker, we
protect ourselves, withholding our trust and help.
Many takers become good takers, acting
generously so that they end up pretending to be givers or matchers.
Takers
live a life of quality referred as “Kissing
up, kicking down”. Takers tend to be
dominant and controlling with subordinates, they are submissive and deferential
toward superiors.
Takers
many rise by kissing up, but they often fall by kicking down. As takers gain
power, they pay less attention to how they are perceived by those below
and next to them. They feel entitled to
purpose self-serving goals and claim as much value as they can. They end up
treating peers and subordinates poorly and jeopardize their relationship and
reputation. Matcher emphasise fairness, equality and reciprocity. When takers
violate these principles, Matchers in their networks belive in an eye for an
eye.
HOW GIVERS SUCCEED BY RECOGNIZING THE POTENTIALS IN OTHERS:
Givers recognize their possible power and influence in having a genuine interest and believe in the potential of their employees, engaging in actions that support others and commiserate that believe, increasing others motivation and effort and helping them achieve their potential.
Takers
take little trust in other people. They hold relatively low expectations for
the potential of their peers and subordinations. Also treat others with
suspicion and distrust.
Even when takers are impressed by another person’s capabilities or motivation, they see the person as a threat, and will not be willing to support and develop him or her.
INFLUENCING OTHERS THROUGH THE
ACT OF GIVING:
Research
suggest that there are two fundamental paths to influence, dominance and
prestige. When we establish dominance, we gain influence because others see us
as strong, powerful, and authoritative. When we earn prestige, we become
influential because others respect and admire us.
Takers in an efforts to claim as much value as possible, they strive to be superior to others. To establish domination, takers specialize in powerful communication, they speak forcefully, raise their voices to assert their authority, express certainty to project confidence and promote their accomplishments.
CONCLUSION:
Giving
and taking are based on motives and values and they are choices that we make
regardless of whether our personalities trend agreeable or disagreeable.
Whether you are nice or not nice is separate from whether you are self-focused
or other focused. They are independent not opposites.
We
engage in truly selfless giving when we feel empathy for another person in
need. Feeling of concern and compassion certainly motivate us to act for the
benefit of others at a personal cost.
If we empathize with other people to the point of merging our own identities with theirs, we care about them as much as we care about ourselves. This is because we no longer place our interest above theirs.
Marcus Aurelius, a Roman Emperor once said,
“Some people, when they do someone a favour, are always booking for a chance to call it in. And some aren’t but they’re still aware of it – still regard it as a debt. But others don’t even do that. They are like a vine that produces grapes without looking for anything in return….. after helping others….. They just go on to something else….. We should be like that”.
And
that is the true road to success!!!
Thank
you.
Comments
Post a Comment